I think that you have to do what works for you and, most importantly, your dc. As much as I love CM I’m certain there are subjects that we are not covering from a purely CM philosophy. Not because I don’t want to, necessarily, but just because I want to cover something in a different way, and I mean no offense to her philosophy, as it has helped me sooo much. What I am trying to adhere to in all of our subjects is the short lessons, attentiveness, narration of some kind, living books, penmanship, among other ideas as they apply. I have found that I can use something that is not necessarily CM (in the way she, Miss Mason, would have described/taught it), but I can use her “ideas” of what to “expect” from my dc or from myself when approaching/planning said program. Does that make sense??
We, too, have some SOTW products and I can’t say that I can remember as much from the audio version (Vol. 4, Jim Weiss narrator), but my oldest enjoys them. They’re too factual for me, but I know some who just love them. Also, we don’t have all the components, which might make a difference for me on how I view the program. I was the one many moons ago that was gaga over MOH. I just couldn’t make that work (CMing it, or not), maybe I could now, but I don’t know.
BTW, we are going to use something coming up soon that I don’t think Miss Mason would’ve thought was aligned with her philosophy. But now that I have a better handle on the way I want to approach it, I plan to keep her ideas, my dc’s personalities, and reality as my guide (and I have been praying a bunch!) no matter what the guide says.
HTH