Combining MUS and Singapore?

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Renee
    Participant

    Is there a way to somehow do both? I really like Singapore and the real world, mental math approach BUT I like the visual explanations of MUS. I didn’t know if it would be possible (not knowing exactly how MUS works, just seeing sample videos) to use the videos to teach the methods, but then do the work in the Singapore workbooks.

    sarah2106
    Participant

    I have not used Singapore, only MUS, but to me that seems like it could be a lot of work and also confusing to match up.

    I think that switching math curriculum over and over has its own sets of challenges. Yes sometimes a switch is very much needed, but to switch again and again, the kids loose the momentum and math is taught at very different scope and sequence so switching from one program to another can be very challenging because previous curriculum was learned at a different “pace”. I have a friend that has used a different math program for the past 4 years, each year something know, and her kids are really struggling because each program has different methods and sequence so sometimes they are “board” reviewing things they really know and other times they are “lost” because skills they never learned but the curriculum is assuming they already know because of its scope and sequence.

    MUS “builds” on itself. Since each level is focused on one type of concept, just Division for example in Delta. It is very thorough, but has a different scope and sequence than other math programs. They learn to master a concept over the year, with built in review, before adding to it with another skill set the following year. As the teacher you could watch the DVD’s, but for example my ODS did a lesson in Delta on division last week and it was division by 10’s. That was all it was introducing for that lesson. Next time it will be Division by another number, and continue to build and review. So it could be difficult if Singapore uses a different way of “building” and reviewing their lessons to match up.

    I do have a friend who has the RS games that they do along with their current math program, and that has worked really well. They do math 4 days/week and then RS games on the 5th day.

    Personally I feel like trying to work with two different math programs could get confusing and overwhelming. Like too many cooks in the kitchen all giving their input 😉 Then again if you find some inexpensive DVD’s on sale, you could always give it a try 🙂

    Renee
    Participant

    I saw something last night about Right Start (that’s what RS stands for, correct?) games.

    I wouldn’t be doing two full curriculums, just using the DVDs as needed to show the process for that particular lesson (the thought was I could use the manuals to find something similar so I could pick and choose). Not knowing MUS, though, maybe it’s organized too differently to work. Being a math minded person, I always just “got it” so trying to explain it to someone isn’t the easiest thing for me to do. Knowing it and teaching it are two different things… not to mention my mind never learned it the way Singapore teaches it (although I will say I wish it did! It appears far simpler 😛 ).

    Tristan
    Participant

    I don’t think using the explanations from one program would fit with the setup and workbook of another. They use different manipulatives, illustrations, and a different sequence of materials.

    Renee
    Participant

    Well shucks… it was worth asking 😛 I figured it might not be that easy. Oh well! Back to the drawing board… or maybe I should just get some of their practice books and work through those every other day for added reinforcement.

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • The topic ‘Combining MUS and Singapore?’ is closed to new replies.