Over and over we see these issues ….
- What subjects to teach?
- What specific materials to use to teach each subject?
- How often to do a specific subject in a week’s time?
We CM folk seem to get really bogged down in “choices” and seem to often flail and flop around when things are not spelled out succinctly and directly. We yearn for someone else to spell it out. Yet this same abundance of choice and freedom are the essence of a CM education. I put myself in this boat too from time to time but maybe a little less so. I don’t say that to sound like I’m some kind of wonder parent over here and a CM guru. Hardly! I just think that for me, and in my experience with CM thus far, I approached it as a methodology and a philosophy more than a curriculum. That seems to have helped me a great deal as the years go on and we now find ourselves in high school.
I accepted the full list of subjects that were taught or suggested to be taught by CM from two sources – SCM and AO. Together they made up a very rich and full list of subjects to teach k-12. I don’t think it ever occurred to me to try to figure these out myself or create my own list. Nor do I think it ever occurred to me to try to do someone else’s combination of these subjects. I knew enough of the philosophy of CM to know variety was key and I continually focus on providing that variety and try not to look too long at the combinations that others are doing. What works for one family, works for that family. Every season is different and you can always change things around – add, delete, do mini periods of study.
I used the suggestions of everyone everywhere on what materials to use and I also decided for myself what books I liked and wanted to be reading along with my kids. If one didn’t work, we dropped it and got another. We never purchased much but instead used the public library, used book sales and the internet. Sure, sometimes it is frustrating when something doesn’t work but it’s also a challenge we accepted when we took this leap to homeschooling.
More than the search for the perfect CM curriculum, the real issues seem to be: 1) embracing (through knowledge of) the educational philosophy of Charlotte Mason and 2) our own confidence. We are boldly stepping in to a non-traditional role for education and we must act with confidence that we are what we believe we are – totally, utterly qualified and the perfect people for the job.
If a family embraces the CM philosophy and by doing so learns the methods for it and practices those methods consistently then that is where the results come to fruition. I’d argue that aside from the universally accepted “stay away from twaddle” there aren’t any choices in materials that will lead to failure in and of themselves. It’s more likely a case of user error – meaning a failure to consistently apply the methods in the CM philosophy. I know that’s been true for me over and over.
Just my two cents … please know I put myself firmly in the same court as anyone who has struggled or struggles in this passion of CM homeschooling. I’m not being a know-it-all but I did want to share observations that seem obvious when you scroll our posts and elsewhere in the CM realm.
I think sometimes it makes me sad to see us struggle with an educational philosophy that is, by its very nature, a wonderful parade of goodness and also a rigorous and relaxed way of life for the whole family and especially the child.
I printed off the Alveary example for the upper grades to see how we compared this year – out of curiosity. I really didn’t find us lacking. I was a little surprised but then I remembered what Sonya taught me years ago …. to recognize lessons where they were happening and to not be afraid to count things twice if I felt I could. What a great guide you are Sonya. Thank you!
Okay … mind cleared; thoughts shared. Check. 🙂