Nebby,
I read your blog post on classical education and was very interested in the fact that you quoted from the vandamme article. I stumbled upon this same article months ago and was very disturbed by it. While I don’t really know what to think about the methods of modern classical education, as she calls it, I do agree with the troubles that come from the public school angles hence my desire to home educate. But as I read her article and found that her mentor/ philosophy came from Ayn Rand a staunch supporter of objectivism I decided to look up what objectivism actually was by definition and research Rand’s philosophy. Rand states that “he(man) must exist for his own sake and that “The pursuit of his own rational self-interest and of his own happiness is the highest moral purpose of his life.” this is not in line with my understanding of what God calls us to be as Christians and was bothered by the fact that the she implies that the main purpose of Christian classical educators was to indoctrinate children in a dogma of Christianity based on beliefs that were not based on reality.her definition of reality(objectivism) being “Reality exists as an objective absolute—facts are facts, independent of man’s feelings, wishes, hopes or fears. Part of vandammes article state “The purpose of Christian classical education is neither to teach a student to think nor to teach him facts. To teach a student to think is to teach him to think independently—but independent thinking is incompatible with the acceptance of dogma and the tenets of Christianity.
As I stated, I am not sure that the methods imposed by the classical educators today is right and I myself lean more towards a CM style education but I do want for my children, as you stated in your blog very beautifully, that my children know Christ intimately as their Creator and to educate them so that they may become the person that he has purposed them to be.
My purpose for this post is not to be argumentative but to be corrected if my thinking is wrong or to become more educated on the idea of objectivism. I was just bothered by her comments and what seemed to me a disdain for the teaching of Christianity. If the classical style of education in its method is wrong Is she the one to base that opinion on? I am only asking and would love to hear others comments.