I probally have asked this question over and over again but I keep revising my plans for science for next year. I really don’t want to spoil my sons love for nature and science by pushing him too hard and at the same time I don’t want him to be bored and not stimulated enough to want to learn. We are finishing up 106 days of creation for first grade science this year. We did not use considering Gods creation to go along with it because of his age. DS will be second grade! I have purchased The outdoor Secrets book and companion! I know that this will only last me maybe one term. Would doing the outdoor secrets along with the list of living books suggested be enough for a second grader. I am looking at apologia and some other curriculums but im just so unsure! Apologia looks great and so does Answers In Genesis but is it too early to start those? I want to make the right decision. I just need some opinions regarding this!
I’ve also gone back and forth between doing living books and/or something more laid out like 106 Days or Outdoor Secrets w/ companion guide. I think I have too many ideas and I know I’ll overwhelm myself if I try to stuff too much in. I’m planning on doing the Outdoor Secrets with my dd6 this year and doing 2 days a week to stretch it over the year, then still do nature study/journal day that is just spontaneous. I think it will be enough for her age. For second grade I think I’ll do more living books like the Burgess Bird book and Animal book and add in some activities to go with it. Here’s a good companion site to the Burgess Bird book. It breaks it down by chapter/bird with links to coloring pages with a few questions about each bird, more details about each bird including hearing its call/song. You can also listen to the audio recording of each chapter of the Burgess Bird book there: http://satorismiles.com/2010/03/08/burgess-bird-book-companion/ . For the Burgess Animal book, or Among the People series, I thought about finding pictures of the particular animal to cut out or have her color if she wants and just copying a couple sentences about the animal that she found interesting to put in her nature notebook or on a notebooking page. Anyway, I definitely think living books can be enough. My daughter loved the James Herriott stories btw and wanted me to read them over and over 🙂 Hope this helps!
We’ve always done one area of nature study per term (nature notebook and lots of living books), but this year, I thought I would try 106 Days of Creation. I thought it was laid out very well and I appreciated the wide scope of subjects, but I thought my children gained more in-depth knowledge and appreciation for each area when we spent an entire term on it.
I think that for the elementary years, living science books plus observation/nature notebook is not only “sufficient”, but a sturdy foundation to build upon.
Of course, this is just my 2 cents. There are many ways to do it “right”. I just wanted to encourage you that going without a “formal” curriculum works well for at least this family! 🙂
I just wrote a blog post yesterday sharing what we do for science, with recommendations for living books and other resources that we love, plus links to a blog post for many of the subject areas that we’ve studied (birds, trees, reptiles, amphibians, etc.) Perhaps it might give you some ideas!