Hi there,
I will be honest and say I am still in the research stage of homeschooling. I do not have children yet, but I have been off and on reading up on it for years. (yes, indeed, I am that nerdy). But I want to go into this as prepared as I can be. I selected Charlotte Mason a couple of years ago. In fact, it was reading about CM initially that made me think that homeschooling might be a good idea and not some ‘crazy backwoods evangelical thing’. (forgive me I was young and very liberal then). I loved reading and typically read, myself about 1000 pages a week, plus internet political reading, and I love the idea of a literature based approach to education. I think of all the twaddle I read growing up (and indeed still read. Nora Roberts, anyone?) And I hope that I can raise my children to love good books. I also hope that my own reading and writing skills will improve.
As much as I can tell, it would appear that my views would be in the minority here with reguards to science. I am a biologist, and evolution has never caused me any disquiet. I reconciled it to genesis long, long ago. I dont’ like the worldviews that natural selection leads to. I also don’t believe that I am here by random chance. So I guess you could say that I would believe in some form of ID. My husband is more heavily in the ID camp than I am. However, I find that the framework of natural selection is very usefull for organizing concepts, especially in the fields of ecology (predator- prey interactions) and of course, genetics. As an environmental scientist, I can honestly say that evolution does not figure heavily (or at all) in my daily job (my job is to detect water pollution and enforce its clean-up). So I don’t worry that belief in ID or creationism will harm them if they want to persue a science field. But I want my future children to have a good understaning of both schools of thought (and to be well aquainted with the genesis account, of course).
After that long introduction, here are my questions. Rainbow and Apolgia science programs are christian-based. But I am evidence that Christian beliefs on the topics of geology and biology run the gamut from a literal interpretation of genesis, with a young earth, and creation in 7 days; to genesis being allegorical with evolution by process of natural selection being the method God used to bring about life. I am somewhat in-between…
what do these science programs espouse? Young earth? Old earth? ID? Genesis as literal truth? I hope my statements of my understanding is not insulting. I really just want a very rigorous science program. I went to a high school where you could take four years of physics (ap 1 and ap 2 after physics 1 and adv. physical science). Plus ap bio and ap chem. I want my children to be able to have the options of higher level science that I had. I took two scienece courses a year after my freshman year.
thank you
Catherine