We really enjoyed it too. It was very low-key; we did the lessons mainly orally. I skipped some that I didn’t think were needed. (assuming you’re talking about the one by Emma Serle)
We are on lesson 4. My son (gr 3) is feeling very positive so far. Particularly loves that the program has a few picture narrations! A good amount of variety from lesson to lesson and most are short. Some are oral and very short. Others involve more writing and take more time. One thing I found interesting is that the book is recommended for grade 2 and up and yet does ask for dictation — right from Lesson 2. Granted the dictation is short, but I was surprised to see it so early. I knew my son wasn’t ready for it yet, so we skipped it and just treated that lesson as copywork.
Good luck!
Andi
April 11, 2012 at 4:10 am
Anonymous
Inactive
We use PLL for our 7 and 9 yr old. We love love it! I wish I had started using it earlier but I did not have good understanding of the CM method at that time. There is also a website that you can go to for supplemental info and books. It is http://www.primarylanguagelessons.com It has a lot of wonderful resources.
We love it. We’re on our fourth go-round now, and it’s worked well for students with very different learning styles. I’ve adjusted the lessons, particularly at first, where it seems like a ton of writing for a young boy. Sometimes we’ve used the lengthy early dictation lessons as copywork; some of the lengthy copywork exercises, we’ve used only part of, or broken into several days’ work. Littlest, almost 9, has been using it for two years now and still looks forward to pulling it out each day.
Good choice, then we followed it up with ILL. Starting in third grade, you could move fairly quickly. We did about half of it orally and skipped the dictation exercises. I highly recommend getting the teacher’s guide. I got mine at Amazon.
Here’s another one for love it! We started it in 1st grade, and we moved pretty slowly through it (on purpose) but we really loved it. For dictation, I had him do it as copywork instead. And if I didn’t really care for a poem for whatever reason ( I think there were two I replaced – don’t remember why), I picked a Psalm of about equal size for him to memorize instead. Never used the teacher’s guide with it. Wasn’t really a need for it.
We love both PLL and ILL. I use PLL with my 5th grader, but he is only on his 2nd year of English. We adopted him almost 2 years ago with no prior English. And we use ILL with our 4th grader who is 9.
I also skip as needed and most if not all lessons we complete orally. It is very meaty though in my opinion and just gentle enough. I have to say I would NOT order the Teacher Guides if I had seen them (ordered on-line), but they are not bad. I just don’t feel I need them for the approach we take. Still it is a very reasonably priced resource even with the Teacher Guides.
I used the Teacher’s Guide more for ILL than PLL, but it still came in useful; I’d buy it again. Many of the lessons in both pre-suppose knowledge that I didn’t have, esp. since it was an older book.
I didn’t know certain names of certain art pieces and the info. was helpful with those; the art observation lessons I didn’t skip, they are important for oral narration and organizing thoughts.
I also did not have them memorize the poems, but they did read them aloud, answer any questions and I read the info. about them from the TG.
I used the hardback version of PLL, not the Living Books Curriculum version.
I did happen to find a sample of teacher guide on the lost classics site for PLL, it does give quite a bit of detail on certain works of art in the book. The free versions I found don’t have that.