After reading it and doing a quick copy/paste into my personal wordpad file that I have recently started, I realized a few things…..
1. In order to have a complete LA program (CM style) I have to utilize every part of the SCM guide. I can’t just pick out one part and do it without all the rest and expect to have a well rounded LA curriculum. For example, I tried using Queen’s LL, my own copy work, a reading comprehension workbook, and another spelling program. It was too hard for me to try and keep up with. There were picture studies in the LL, but we had our own picture studies scheduled weekly—there was copy work in LL, but we had our own copy work that I wanted to do—we had reading comprehension questions in our workbooks, but tried to narrate in history!! 🙂 I was trying to skip this, plan that, fill in the gaps, and make it all fun at the same time. IMPOSSIBLE!!
2. There are specific reasons why SCM has picked certain things to use so that it will not overlap too much and cause Mommy meltdown. JAG and AG are just for teaching the parts of speech. Narration is for composition and comprehension. Copy Work is for penmanship and exposure to good sentence structure (etc.). Dictation is for spelling. Living books are for vocabulary, good examples of word usage, etc. And so, if ALL used together, these things make up a great curriculum. I was not seeing the big picture……..
3. With all that said, someone like me who is not very confident in her LA skills may feel that she needs more help with instructing her children in subjects like: composition, grammar, etc. That is where the problems lies with me. I can see that narration is a great tool for teaching composition, but I don’t feel confident enough to look at something my child has written to see if it is all grammatically correct. Spelling is also a weakness of mine. So, how can a mother who is not a LA scholar but wants to utilize the CM method teach her child with more confidence?
BTW, I just started LLATL with my 3rd grade daughter to try and have a more CM feel with more structure for the teacher. I don’t know if it is going to work or not…..just wanted to add that in. 😉
Plus, when I bought LLATL, the lady who sold it to me suggested that I add Easy Grammar daily. She said there was not enough grammar practice in LLATL. So, in addition to all this I wanted to ask this…..
How on earth do you know how much is enough grammar??? LOL!!
I am not sure how you decide what to do, when to do it, and how to teach it….
I’m not fretting, just very puzzled by all the different opinions on language arts. I assume it all depends on what standard you are using (state standards, personal opinions, CM standards, Classical standards, etc.)
Yes, you are correct that it depends on what standard you are using. I used to fret over this. The total CM way appeals to me more, but I was afraid I’d be lacking. Only you can decide as the parent what way is best for your children. I struggled and finally decided I’d do most things the CM way, but language arts is so critical I feel the need to make sure my bases are covered, just in case (hope I don’t get into trouble here!) If anyone disagrees with the following exerpt, I’d love to hear more on this. But what convinced me to do more with LA was this section from an article by Susan Wise Bauer, a literary professor. You can google the whole article—or I belive it is http://www.welltrainedmind/charlottemason.html. She compares classical vs. CM (though I think CM IS classical). She cites how very similar the two methods are in most areas, but the LA is very different. She is quoting from Catherine Levison’s book on CM. Here is the composition/grammar section:
Composition and grammar. My biggest disagreement with Levison’s recommendations have to do with methods of teaching writing. Levison writes, “Charlotte Mason…assures us [children] will be able to write if they have had good books. There is a strong warning in Home Education not to hamper children with instruction.” She goes on to suggest that children aged six to nine do only oral narrations; ten and eleven year olds do written narrations and “learn punctuation and capitalization by seeing so much well-written literature. Composition comes naturally to children who have spent time with books.” Nine to twelve year olds write essays on history and literature, junior high students “write on subjects they are really interested in,” and only high school students do formal essays. “Even then,” Levison concludes, “we are not to ‘teach’ much.” She suggests instead that they take notes on history, literature, and art, write letters to the newspaper, and write research papers. In my experience, this method just doesn’t work for many students; I’ve seen reams of wretched writing from children who have read plenty of good literature. Literature needs to be read and appreciated, but grammar and composition skills are quite different from literature; these skills need to be explicitly taught, or students will not know how to construct essays or how to use complex language to support their arguments. I also find that students who don’t do plenty of short, skill-building assignments early on are completely lost when they arrive in junior high and are told to “write on subjects they are really interested in.” They need careful instruction in the skill of building written arguments.
I’m not suggesting that young children be forced to write reams every day. Rather, I’m recommending that even young children study grammar (Mason’s 15-20 minutes per day is a good guideline here), learn the rules of proper usage, and do short (one to two sentence) writing assignments in order to apply those rules. Middle grade students need a formal writing curriculum so that they can learn how to put paragraphs and compositions together. Without this preparation, they are likely to flounder in high school – and it is much more difficult to learn writing skills for the first time in ninth grade than to learn them gradually in the eight grades preceding. Writing continues to be a weak area in the larger home school community; we need more, not less, explicit teaching in this area.
My personal compomise is to follow CM in the early years, then in 3rd grade we use Writing Tales (kid-friendly/short lessons) and then 5th grade Classical Writing(deeper, but both are progymnasmata programs—the classical Greek way of teaching children to develop their writing into the rhetorical stage), because I want my kids to be able to develop arguments/persuasive essays. Maybe this can be achieved the CM way, too, but I don’t have enough confidence that I’d do that well:) We also use JAG/AG that SCM recommends for grammar. I’d love to hear more comments on this. Blessings, Gina
I’m still debating how to do LA, too. I’m a grammar geek who never learned to diagram a sentence, but understood grammar anyway, so I hope to find a program for upper grades that doesn’t require diagramming. I have a kindergartner now. Since we’ll be starting first grade in July, I’m already trying to figure out what to do in this area. If I use our state standards in this area, I must cover nouns, verbs, adjectives, pronouns, capitalization, end punctuation, synonyms, antonyms, compound words, syllabication, and ABC order to first letter. (Some of this is introductory). That seems like a lot. I know I’ll do the CM way with copywork to enforce punctuation and capitalization and put off parts of speech, but I’m thinking of working on compound words, syllables, and ABC order anyway. (See my other post).
As to teaching him composition, I suppose I’ll wait and see how well he does with narrations first. I doubt I’ll have him do anything in that area in first grade, since he’s just now willing to do a small amount of copywork.
That article was very helpful…and confusing too. LOL!! No, I really do see what she is saying and I have read it before. I actually have it linked on my blog. The problem is that I am not sure what to use to cover all my bases because I’m not sure what bases are the most important. Does that make sense? My kids are 7 and 9 right now, and I know that if I told my 7 yr. old to write a sentence about dogs he could not do it. That bothers me. My daughter, on the other hand, writes whole books that she makes up based on books that she has read. Her sentence structure is not all that great and she begins a lot of sentences with and, but she can correct it when I point it out. I do agree that composition has to be taught. I am just not so sure how to teach it. 🙂
I love every idea in the CM method, but I am just not sure that I (as the teacher) can use the LA methods the way they are suppose to be done. I love copywork, literature based curricula, dictation, artist/composer studies, habit training, nature studies, and making Bible a main subject. Parts of the LA is what I have difficulty with. Mainly grammar and compostition 😉
I have tried using SWB’s Writing With Ease, and we HATED it. We tried Abeka Language workbooks and they were also detested. Then I tried Queen’s LL and are now doing EFTC with my son and LLATL with my daughter. LOL!! (not all these changes were in one year, btw) LLATL is the only thing I have found that seems CM-ish but has more help for the teacher. It covers more grammar and several other skill that these other programs did not offer. But still I have people telling me that it is not enough. 🙁 What are they basing that argument on? State standards, I guess. I also have looked at Wordsmith Apprentice writing curriculum and it seems interesting too.
Anyway, I am rambling so I need to quit typing 🙂 Much to think about………
I will just add my 2 cents. You can give a lot or a little. You can make it hard or easy. For me I decided that grammar is grammar if I just fine a program I like, that works for my kids and then stick with it; it will in the end cover everything I need. I need to stop second guessing myself and be happy.
That said I have decided that LL by Queens is this. My kids like it, they do well with it, it is short and they can accomplish a lot (which makes them feel good) and it has an answer key (which I MUST have). I then have Jr. A/G and will get A/G to help fill in as they get older. I spoke with the author yesterday and she totally made me feel great about what we were doing though it felt like we were doing it all wrong.
What I’m saying is this. Find something that works for you and that the “scope & sequence” seems to cover it all for your family. The more we search for something “better” the harder it is to appreciate what we have. Anyway.. that’s just what I have come to realize for our family and I hope it helps someone else out there.
I know, I can bet bogged down with all of this, too. Probably because I have spent A LOT of time on the Well-Trained Mind forum and reading what other moms are doing. Just my opinion, but I wouldn’t be concerned about your 7-yr. old having trouble writing creatively. I only have my 7 yr. old doing copywork and he orally narrates readings. We do use Spelling Workout, but I don’t make him do it all and it’s very short. We used a language arts program with my current 10 yr. old when she was in 1st/2nd and she had a lot of difficulty writing creatively—like pulling teeth. That’s why I like Writing Tales/Classical Writing—-going on the premise of copying great works first while kids are still building their base of knowledge—they’ll have more to write about later. Actually, the 1st 2 levels (3rd/4th) are basically just written narrations and beg. grammar (and they correct their spelling/edit their work).
If LLATL is working good for you, I wouldn’t worry about what other people think:) Unless you have true concerns. If people are saying the grammar isn’t enough, I think using JAG/AG at some point covers everything you need—rec. by both SCM and WTM. I’m more CM with this—don’t see the need in so much grammar in the earlier years. Have you looked at PLL or ILL? I plan to use PLL with my son for 2nd/3rd.
I’m not much help, but I commisserate with you! Blessings, Gina
You’re right, Amanda, it’s all in which standards and approach you decide to accept. Some approaches believe that Grammar must be taught all year every year with constant reinforcement, like math skills. Some approaches believe that Composition must be taught in a systematic fashion, bit by bit.
It seems like one of the main differences between CM and other approaches is that Charlotte believed the children were absorbing a lot on their own and didn’t need direct, formal teaching on those subjects until they were older. Grammar should wait, because it is an abstract concept and a finite body of information. Composition instruction should wait until the students had mastered the art of narration and had developed their own style based on their readings of great minds’ ideas. Charlotte was concerned that traditional Composition lessons would limit the students to a stilted style and force them to merely summarize others’ thoughts on subjects that had no significance to the students.
Now, that being said, if the mother finds she needs help with guiding her student in fine-tuning his Composition skills when he is older, some of the courses mentioned on this forum might come in handy. But I would be wary of using them in the younger grades.
You mentioned also feeling a bit wobbly in Grammar and Spelling. Might I give an idea? I wonder if it might be helpful if you asked your older student to help you do a prepared dictation exercise or two each week. If that method is designed to help students learn spelling and reinforce good writing style, it might strengthen those skills for Mom too. Just an idea.
Oh, and yes, the SCM Curriculum Guide suggestions for Language Arts are intended to be comprehensive and balanced taken as a whole.
Thank you all for these comments. I can see that LA is just going to be something that will be hard to discuss on a large scale. It depends so much on several different things: Mom’s opinion, the method used, and the child’s needs. I do like LLATL the best and think that using JAG or AG along with LLATL in the upper elementary/middle school years will be a very good idea. I also add my own copywork and picture studies so that will not be overlapping. I hope I have not caused anyone else to be more confused. I just need some reassurance sometimes.
I too am guilty of reading too many posts on TWTM forum. That place only makes me more confused. LOL!!! Anyway, I do appreciate this forum and all of your opinions.
Sonya,
We were posting at the same time…..I have not had time to read all of your post yet, but thatnks for replying 🙂
I don’t know if this will be useful to you, but here you go: I am using PLL w/my son now, in his second year (3rd). I like it, but only rarely do I require any writing from him. I incorporate it orally; he has great handwriting, however he dislikes it and I don’t want to inflame that dislike unecessarily. I am going to use ILL, too. I also use the Elson Readers w/their accompanying workbooks starting in the 2nd grade, but using a CM style presentation, i.e. narrating the story just read insterad of asking questions and using the vocabulary in a CM style (additonally I break the word into syllables on the chalkboard and discuss the root of the word if applicable) and the phonics lesson I use what I”ve learned from “…Tricks” and using “Phonics Made Plain”. I know that may sound a little jumbled but it’s not really. This is a quick explanation; if you want a more detailed one, let me know. Slow and easy, yet steady, is my goal. Instilling their love of language is the beginning and too much writing and strict LA too soon, IMO, destroys that. If they love language, teaching them later all of the rules of language and composition (of which I am a proponent) will come much easier.
For your own personal education in the area of spelling, I can only recommend “ABC’s and all their Tricks”, for the sole purpose of you learning the why’s and wherefore’s of spelling to increase your confidence in this area. I am a natural speller (when I say that I inevitably misspell something!) and LA always came easy to me. However, my son, who is an avid reader, was not doing well in spelling and I didn’t know what to do! So I got that book and Phonics Made Plain for teacing it and now I am quite surprised at how mcuh I am learning! Plus, I feel more confident in teaching. I never really knew why something was spelled a certain way, I just spelled it. But he required more than that and now I’m glad because I was able to educate myself then pass that along to him.
Two more things, another way I “fill in the gaps” is once a week my children each read to themselves and then we discuss it, one of the “What Every Child Should KNow” series for their ‘grade level’. And for you to read, to have a scope and sequence regarding CM, you may be interested in reading through “Teaching Children: A Curriculum guide to what children need to know at each level through grade six” by Diane Lopez and Susan MaCaulay contributing. Ambleside ONline also has a scope and sequence available for you to peruse.
Keep praying for G-ds Guidance, discernment and confidence; He will Provide.
Rachel
(Moderator’s note: Regretfully, we had to remove the link to the Language Arts scope and sequence since Ambleside Online requests that links be made only with their permission and only to their home page. I hope you can find the information by searching their site.)
Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
The topic ‘Observations and Questions on LA (Sonya ;)’ is closed to new replies.