It is true that kids need to read for themselves at some point. My dd12 is capable of completing all of her readings plus the family readings. I love having us all on the same page, but honestly there were times this year that I felt we were holding her back. So, I gave her the family books to either read on her own or to the younger ones. I intend to do that again this coming year. She much prefers not waiting on me.
Shakespeare, poetry, composer, artist, hymn, folk song, and some family read alouds – it just makes more sense and more fun to do together. However, all of my kids 9+ read their own literature and history with a few exceptions of books we want to discuss. I like using a history spine ala SCM when possible via audiobook or me reading. It ties us together in some neat ways. That said the vast majority is independent work.
Remember that Charlotte has given us some great information, methods, and materials, but she was not a wife or a mother with the extra duties and responsibilities that brings. Having kids in the same cycle of history but at their own level is what Chartlotte did in her schools and it’s a way for HS moms to simplify. I don’t think it’s necessary, but it is nice. I toyed with separating our school age kids history-wise for the coming years, but decided against it. I like our conversations and were all learning lots, me included.
Don’t be afraid to give the family books to older kids to read on their own if their applicable. They could be too simple for the oldest and most advanced kids, I suppose, but they’ve been great for me even as an educated adult. You could also find more books of varying density to add for older kids if need be.
Just some random thoughts.
Christie