I have tried to find an exact definition over the last few years for “living books” and have come to the conclusion that there just isn’t a concrete definition out there. They are all pretty similar, but each author will define a “living book” somewhat different.
They are well written, keep the child’s interest/excitement (which will show in their narration), and the author’s passion for the subject matter shows.
Which brings me to my history book question…
From my hodgepodge definition above (and please, correct me if my definition is off) all the Usborne books: Ancient World, Medieval World, etc. (which my children enjoy) would not be “living books”. Streams of Civilization I would not be a living book (which my children cannot stand…me either).
BUUUT…what about the Story of the World volumes? We have the first 2 volumes, and IMO they do seem to fit into the “living books” philosophy. They are well written (for the age they are written for), my children like them and learn from them, and I do feel the author not only has a passion for history, but a passion to share her love of history with children.
Would you consider these CM approved? I’ve read a lot of negative comments on them by other CM homeschoolers, but I’ve also seen that volumes 3 and 4 are used by a lot of CM homeschoolers…
Kathi