How to use SCM living math with my curriculum

Tagged: 

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 39 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Richele Baburina
    Participant

    Hi Erika,

    Great question!  If you are familiar with Charlotte Mason’s methods in reading, handwriting, and narration, you will see definite points of intersection with her methods in teaching mathematics.  If you have the SCM dvd’s you will see the rather deliberate and steady method of introducing writing into the child’s arithmetic lessons.  If you haven’t, you may see how writing was used in the introduction of numbers in this article I wrote.

    In a subject such as History, we don’t hurry written narrations because it is the idea that is of significance and the same is so in mathematics.  We don’t want the labor-intensive act of handwriting to overshadow the idea. Written narration doesn’t begin before the age of nine in a CM education though handwriting does.  In arithmetic, children learn to write their numbers and will on occasion, write problems in their math notebook or on a slate.  Once the meanings of signs are learned, children may write on their dry erase board (or slate, or boogie board, jot board, etc.) the oral question posed:

    “Two marbles plus four marbles equals ___ marbles” and the child writes 2+4=6 on their slate.  During the final lesson on a particular number, writing sums in the math notebook is a treat.  If a rule is “discovered” by the child then it is also written in their math notebook as well.

    Erika, before I go on and on, please let me know if you have the SCM handbook and/or dvd’s so I can refer you to specific places to find the info.  Otherwise, I can continue…

    Best,

    Richele

    Erika
    Participant

    Thank you very much!

    Sincerely,

    Erika

    greenebalts
    Participant

    Thanks Richele,

    Yes, I do have the SCM handbook as well as the DVD. I also have Ray’s Arithmetic. I noticed you said placement in to Strayer-Upton book 1. How would this equate to Ray’s?

    I feel like I own and have tried every math program under the sun. However, I’m coming to see, it’s more about the method than the means (books).

    Richele Baburina
    Participant

    Hi again, Melissa.  Without considering where the tests have placed him, where do you think he is in understanding the “why” along with the “how to?”  Is it multiplication?

    You are right, methods are paramount (I’ll add principles to that), and I am confident that you can give your son the gift of taking each step on firm ground. We won’t talk of “behind” at all.  My youngest son is dyslexic and I’ve witnessed first-hand how CM’s living teaching helps both child and parent rise beyond belief.  If manipulatives are maddening, I would suggest money (coins in a coin bag) and paper dollars (had at the dollar store) as the concrete object of most interest to many children.

    Peace x 1000,

    Richele

    2Corin57
    Participant

    Now, I haven’t read all the replies, I’m just skipping ahead to add this: Charlotte’s methods are wonderful. BUT… math is a subject that it is very important not to keep jumping around a lot on a child, you can end up with gaps in their learning and actually hindering the student, as it sounds like you’re already learning.  So, if Singapore is working well for your son in that he’s making progress and doesn’t hate math, then I would urge you to stick with it, instead of trying to transfer him to something else.

    Also, as much as we want children to *love* learning, most children are going to have likes and dislikes when it comes to certain subjects, and some children just *aren’t* going to like math, some will struggle with it, no matter how great of a program they use. So, at some point we have to accept that they’re not going to love it, and just stick with what is working with the least amount of resistance.  At 10 years old, I would be very cautious about continuing to switch curriculum, as you’re losing time with which to fill in the gaps before you really need start getting into pre-algebra material etc…

    There comes a point in homeschooling where we have to let go of our ideals, and stick with what is working for our children, even if it’s not the method that we would prefer. I’ve been dealing with that myself, too. I think many of us do to some extent.

    Now, you could likely add some CM-elements on the side: add some living books about math, and add some hands on manipulatives etc… when teaching the lesson, but again,  I wouldn’t try to change him completely over to something else now.  Not unless Singapore just flat out is not working at all. Also, while you may feel like he’s “behind”, typically Singapore runs a full grade behind, so a child would be working on 4A/B in grade 5, so he’s not that far off!

    greenebalts
    Participant

    “where do you think he is in understanding the “why” along with the “how to?”

    This is a good question Richele!, lol. I have no idea. Just when I think he has a concept, it’s gone. He can do lower single digit multiplication when it pertains so life. Like the other day, he was trying to figure four fives for whatever reason and knew relatively easily it was 20. It so depends on the day with him. He also really lacks maturity and coping skills so becomes easily frustrated. I’m hoping this continues to get better with time.

    Thanks,
    Melissa

    Katie Mitchell
    Participant

    Hi Rachele,

    I am reading through this thread over & over again, trying not to miss anything! First, I would like to say thank you for being so thorough & helpful!

    A bit of background on our math journey: we started out with RightStart 11 years ago, used it up until 2 years ago when we switched our two bigger boys to Teaching Textbooks(kept the younger kiddos in RS) & now I’m exploring our options again. I do not want to continue with RS. I simply do not have enough time to do it with 4 kiddos, our other subjects, a 4 year old & 2 year old identical twinkies? Also after reading this thread & a few others I can see how it doesn’t ‘fit’! I think I need a mom/teacher tutor…

    <span style=”line-height: 1.5;”>I have two questions so far lol</span>

    – Why do you suggest Ray’s Arithmetic Book 1 & then switch to Strayer-Upton, instead of sticking with Ray’s?

    – I looked at the third Strayer-Upton book & our current curriculum’s (Teaching Textbook) to compare them for pre algebra but they don’t look simular at all. I realize they are different curriculums but, honestly I’m just confused…would it be a bad idea to switch for pre algebra & then again for algebra?

    More to come lol

    Katie

    Richele Baburina
    Participant

    Hi Katie,

    As an identical twinkie myself, I can say most assuredly that we were easier than singles, having our own built-in playmate 😉

    Joseph Ray’s books are all simple to use in conjunction with Charlotte Mason’s methods and would provide a very fine grounding in arithmetic and what is termed “pre-algebra” if used as such.  No one need change.  If following their scope & sequence, I believe the series put out by Mott Media has everything to take a child through eighth grade and they would be ready for algebra in ninth.  I’m not sure when “pre-algebra” became a term -maybe it was coined in order to sell another textbook.  I don’t have Ray’s Algebra or Geometry to see what it is like.

    Strayer-Upton Book I is too advanced for that first year of exploring numbers which Charlotte Mason had for her Year I students. This is why I suggest using Ray’s Primary for the first year if someone is going to use Strayer-Upton.  Book I and II will take one up through basically everything needed before algebra is introduced.  A difference I’ve noted (and I may have missed something) is that Strayer-Upton introduces ratio and proportion in Book III after introducing algebra and then leads the student in using the principles of equations to find the unknown number in proportions.

    You definitely spurred me to take a closer look at Strayer-Upton Book III.  I had assumed incorrectly that it was mainly a business math book but am pleasantly surprised to find it a quite nice mix of practical arithmetic and ‘business math,’ practical geometry and a beautiful introduction to algebra.  Charlotte Mason had all three going at once in her upper forms and I like it exceedingly.  If one has already been following CM’s forms, practical geometry would have already been covered by this point though and proofs begun.  If one hadn’t, then it is a great way to build excitement for formal proof geometry to take place later.

    Does this help at all?  Of course, I am a firm believer in Charlotte’s philosophy of education.  If education were a jigsaw puzzle, I try to suggest books based on those that fit nicely into that big picture rather than a math program that seems more like a stray piece from another picture just placed on top.

    Warmly,

    Richele

     

    Katie Mitchell
    Participant

    Awwweeee Richele❤❤ Twins are so amazing! You are right hey and all my other kiddos have plenty of playmates ?

    I’m not sure how part of my post got jumbled sorry if it was confusing!

    Your replies are always so thoughtful, thank you! I’m going through as many threads as I can trying to get answers instead of asking those that have already been asked/answered!

    Yes, you answered my first question. I didn’t realize Strayer-Upton started out more advanced so I understand now why you make that switch.

    Your thoughts on pre algebra are interesting and helpful! Unfortunately we as a society often try to complicate things, while trying to make them ‘better’. I need as much simplicity in my life as possible. To me CM is that simplicity & peacefulness I’m craving! I don’t want any of those ‘stray pieces’ in our bigger picture❤

    I need to clarify the second question though because I do not think I was clear enough for you to be able to answer lol…Right now my bigger boys are using Teaching Textbooks. My 14 year old is 2 lessons away from being done with there grade 7. So I what I am asking is would you switch your child to Strayer-Upton for just grade 8 (pre algebra) and then switch curriculums again for Algebra and Geometry? Lol although, I see that you are talking another look at Strayer-Upton III for those subjects now. I am glad you were pleasantly surprise and not overwhelmed with more to look at!

    I feel that way right now. I should have been better prepared, and had him prepared to start high school this year! Right now I’m focusing on math, know I have so much more to figure out.

    Richele Baburina
    Participant

    Oh, Katie, that was my attempt at subtly saying, “I don’t know.”   🙂 But let’s look at it together, shall we?

    If you have the SCM math handbook then there is a section in the Appendix called, “Choosing a Homeschool Math Curriculum or Textbook.”  In it, I walk through some of the things to look for.  I haven’t seen Teaching Textbooks and only have the Cathy Duffy Review to give me any insight.  It seems it is a straightforward approach with no frills.  Those are things Charlotte liked.  I don’t know how long it takes to get through a lesson but Charlotte didn’t go beyond 30 minutes in high school and the amount of problems assigned in a lesson were less than most curricula in the US today.

    It looks like there is a built in review in TT, which is good.  Sometimes I see parents assigning all the sets of problems when the textbook itself only suggests one set for the new concept and one for review, so I encourage parents to double-check that so they aren’t having their children sludge  through tons of busy work.  With pre algebra I would double-check the scope and sequence and make sure it isn’t merely a review of what he has only just finished.  He may have had “pre algebra” without you being aware of it.

    The Algebra course for TT also might have a review in the beginning that would provide enough of what he needs to move into algebraic thinking in a seamless way. For example, my son had already had fractions, decimals, negative numbers, area and volume so didn’t need a “pre algebra” course before moving into Algebra.  Your child may be able to go straight to TT Algebra, saving time and $.  I just can’t tell from here.  N.B. I’ve also seen many Algebra II books just reviewing Algebra I for a good chunk of the book since many American students have Geometry in between.

    Charlotte Mason would exclude long, tedious problems for calculation.   She would insist upon neatness and accuracy.  She would be sure her teachers did not “over-teach.”  No boring, verbose teaching in her classrooms allowed.

    Also, she would want students acquainted with “captain” ideas.  Subjects or great thinkers were introduced through a short history and practical exercises were introduced as early as possible.

    Your turn to tell me what you think.  Also, something to keep in mind is that I don’t have wi-fi on my little mountaintop so I can’t stream video samples unless I head into the city.  I will be in tomorrow though if you have a link you want to provide.

    Best,

    Richele

     

    Katie Mitchell
    Participant

    Richele

    I’m sorry I didn’t mean for you to review TT. I know you can’t review everything & that part of your book shows us how to do it ourselves. I do not own your book/DVD yet but it is on my list! Thank you though for taking the to do so & sharing your thoughts with me, I really do appreciate it all!

    I agree that it is straightforward, no frills.

    Most lessons take about 30 minutes for my son who is nearing the end of TT7, but not all. He does not like stopping when the timer goes off! He says he wants to finish what he is doing if it is math, writing or really anything he is doing on his own, because he doesn’t want to forget what he is doing. Have you dealt with this with one of your children? I see the benefits of short lessons & for the most part we are embracing it fully!

    There is built in review. I am hoping to go over TT’s pre-algebra & Algebra I scope and squence this week to see if he has had enough instruction to were possibly I could start him with Harold Jacob’s books. I really am unsure of what to use…but I know I want it to line up with so many of the points you have made/shared! Both of my bigger boys have really enjoyed TT, mainly because they can get it done no matter what it going on outside of the computer room ? But I have had more than one person tell me recently that TT did not prepare their child enough for college math ?

    In June you said you were reviewing a newly published curriculum, do you have anything to share on that topic?

    Sort of related,just sharing – I saw in another thread you were talking about rotating Business Math,  Algebra & Geometry through out the week. I really like that idea to help keep it all fresh in your mind!

    Well that’s enough for tonight. I look forward to continue this conversation!

    Katie

     

    Salina Fedrick
    Participant

    Hello Richele, I posted Help with Math yesterday 9/27/2016 and I’m just now seeing your posts here. My son is 14 in the 8th gr and quite behind on math and I have done LOF with him and he likes it, but I just feel like I need something with it or on it’s own. Could I start him at the beginning for the CM math and get him up to speed pretty quick? I am so stressed out that he is so behind and I just don’t know what to use with him. Should I use something in addition to the CM math? Thank you for any help.

    Richele Baburina
    Participant

    Hello simplemom,

    Let’s take a deep breath in and out before we set to work.  Remember, fear can pull and push but Love leads and guides.  We read in Jeremiah 33: 25, 26 that God created the fixed laws of heaven and earth.  The same One who created and sustains mathematical principles created you and your son and will sustain you.

    Every part of math is a practical tool given by Him to explore the universe and gives us insight into His consistent, steadfast character.  Even the fact that we can rely on the multiplication table working shows His great love for us.  In Him are infinite stores of learning, wisdom, and virtue, graciously placed at our disposal.

    Have you read the previous posts in this thread then?  The same words of encouragement apply to you.

    I need to know if you have 1/2 hour daily to sit with your son during math?  If so, I am confident that he can make sure and steady progress.  It will have to be at his pace but if he can give math his attention and be diligent for the full thirty minutes then it should move quickly enough.

    I have to attend to the rest of our school day here and then meet my husband at his business.  My hope is to be able to write more to you tonight about what it would take to implement CM math.  If there is any other pertinent information please let me know.

    Warmly,

    Richele

    Salina Fedrick
    Participant

    Thank you so much Richele, I look forward to your post.

    Richele Baburina
    Participant

    Hi simplemom,

    I have a questions so bear with me:

     

    You said your son knows addition and subtraction.   Does this mean double-digit, triple-digit, etc.?

    Have you looked over the posts regarding Charlotte Mason’s living teaching of math?

    Have you looked at the SCM materials available in the bookstore?

    Is Charlotte Mason’s living approach to math something you want to pursue?  It will require you to sit with your son for half an hour each day.   Personally, I find it just as relationship building to be sitting with my 9th grader in Algebra as it was sitting with him for a read-aloud in his younger years.  It doesn’t require you to be a math major but you will need to put in some time and effort in order to guide him but your son will do the actual math by his own power.

    I’m not here to sell you anything but if you are going to start with “Introduction to Multiplication” and continue with the CM method for construction of multiplication tables, advanced multiplication, division, and fractions then you would want the Living Math DVD-set as Sonya and I demonstrate exactly how to go about it.  The handbook is a pretty quick 99-page read that lays out the methods but goes deeper into the philosophy which undergirds them.  Here’s Cathy Duffy’s non-biased review of the dvd set.  The book is good to have on hand as a ready reference.  You could use Ray’s Primary Arithmetic –which is in the public domain for free– for questions related to each number in the multiplication table and simple division.

    I shy away from reviewing math curriculum but I do like to share when I find a book that makes it simple to implement CM’s methods that rest upon her sound philosophy.  For our family that has been (and you’ve already seen it if you’ve read through all the conversation in this post) Ray’s and Strayer-Upton.  I’ve been able to take my eldest through  elementary arithmetic to pre-algebra for about $55 total.

    You may have something at home already that you can use for this though.  If I were more imaginative I probably wouldn’t have needed to have books to glean the oral questions from but I felt most comfortable having them by my side.

    Not knowing you or your son but thinking generally of a 14-year-old boy of average intelligence, I do think one could reach a happy understanding and true mathematical thinking in multiplication, division, fractions, decimals and percents in a school year.  It would require consistency on both your parts of 30 minutes a day in the morning and a 5 minute mental review of facts scheduled later in the day.  Would you be happy with that much progress?

    Best,

    Richele

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 39 total)
  • The topic ‘How to use SCM living math with my curriculum’ is closed to new replies.