Potpourri, I also blend. I heard from a wise homeschooling mom/ article that public schools across the nation are good in different subjects. For instance, Indiana has the best Science. Another state had the best Math. Iowa had the best Agriculture. ect… Why don’t they put those curriculums together to get a better school? Why don’t we? If apologia is great in science and you are sticking with one curruculum are you getting the best of the curruculum? I know we all have different styles and our children learn differently. why not go with what is best with them and what is best on the market as well. I guess that is why I have so many books around. 🙂 If we keep trying to find the best for our students we will have a blended curriculum. Not every company can give us the best of every subject.
We used MFW last year for the first time and our children absolutely loved it! We did pretty much the whole thing and everyone said it was the best school year, yet. I would have described myself as a pretty die-hard CMer (as a former CM group leader and current HS conference speaker on CM methods), but it helped me to have a broader perspective on other things besides CM that can be nourishing, educational and enjoyable for our children. I particularly enjoyed that it was something we all did together as a family, something which I also really appreciate about SCM.
We combine CM beautifully with the unschooling philosophy. I know it sounds shocking, but when you read Charlotte’s own words about the importance of “person” in how you see your child, her ideas on what real learning is measured by and other things – well, it actually works very nicely together. I aspire to an organic, fluid, but rigorous educational environment. I’m not a radical unschooler. I do shape and guide and strew our environment, but I also do not believe that anyone learns anything they do not actually want to learn. I see it as a personal challenge to show them why learning Math is important … and that keeps me on my toes. If my argument is weak, then theirs has more weight. It’s more important for me to find ways to excite them about subjects and let them naturally see where and how something might be important to them now or later. Exposure to great ideas, art and music blends so perfectly with CM’s ideas on why an appreciation of the arts is important. It is important to me that our environment is one of excited enthusiasm for learning and not one of dread, assignments, heavy schedules etc. It is a delicate balance. Some days/weeks are much easier than others. We certainly have our moments of consternation! But over all the two philosophies give us a great balance and help me to stay focused on why I homeschool. Which has nothing to do with bringing school home!
We have incorperated some Waldorf into our school for art. We use Form Drawing For Beginners, and Painting and Drawing In Waldorf Schools Classes 1 to 8. I like these books because they have lesson plans for teaching painting and drawing and they are based of stories you read to the child throughout your school year. We are also using modeling clay to make sculptures of scenes from our stories. These work for me to be able to add creating art into our school days. I would like to include more movement as well but am having more trouble with that aspect of Waldorf. But that is it for Waldorf. We mostly follow the curriculum here with a few books from Catholic Heritage.
I’ve been asked for more detail on how I combine IEW & SCM. I’ve had the Teaching Writing Structure & Style seminar DVDs for several years, but didn’t truly utilize IEW methods until last year while my then 11yos was in CC Essentials. I used IEW’s theme based writing lessons for U.S. History. This made all the difference in using the TWSS methods. The TE and student guides are well written and have all the info needed (when the free downloadable Student Resource Guide is used) to complete each assignment. They are best implemented after a few years of CM style copywork, dictation, and narration, at least that’s been what’s worked at our house.
I am currently leading a co-op that is using the middle ages tbwl’s and the families are following their own reading lists. The youngest in the class is a 10yog and oldest is 13yob. I am using this with the SCM Module 4 suggestions and the books & DVDs we’ve gathered through the years that fit with the medieval/ren/ref time periods.
The other families watched some, but not all of the TWSS DVDs prior to starting our weekly meetings this year. But, they’ve not watched them all and are doing quite well with the assignments at home because the tbwl’s are so well written. I don’t think you’d need to purchase the TWSS in order to be successful with the tbwl’s. I just choose one that will go with either the history or science topic we will study for the year as a family. It works well for us.
Becca, thank you. I plan to try the Institute for Excellence in Writing at some point. I have heard good things about it. My oldest is 8 right now and we are still working on copywork and narration. It sounds like 10 years old is a good place to start, combining with CM methods. Does IEW cover much grammar, or would one need a separate grammar course?
Potpourri, we also blend with what works best for our family. I try to keep with CM methods, but I am open to other programs. We use Explode the Code phonics workbooks, which we used when we started with Sonlight. They work for us.
Grammar is taught in IEW through a sort of incidental way. It’s not a workbook style. It’s discussed on an as needed basis depending on new assignment goals. Punctuation is also part of the program and the lessons are geared toward at least two levels, A and B. “A” lessons will have fewer grammar/punctuation requirements and are often at least one paragraph shorter than “B.” So, during your first year of use, you may only assign fairly easy work. That said, one of the 10 year olds in our co-op is working on level B with the older kids even though she’s had no formal writing instruction. She’s an avid reader, so the writing assignments are coming to her easily because of her extensive background with English language usage. My 12yos is just now able to handle B level with encouragement. He had last year’s level A experience to pull from, which made this possible. He was slower in learning to read, but is improving with writing at a nice pace.
My requirement that children be 10 in order to participate in the class was based on observation. At 10, with no prior writing instruction, level A should usually be manageable, but will require habit development. In some cases, level B is also appropriate without having used IEW beforehand. It will depend on each child/family. It’s very adjustable. With two years of tbwl’s under our belts, I’ll assign similar lessons for subjects on my own and my son will becable to complete with encouragement, but little help. Some will do this sooner, others later.
We blend resources and homeschooling methods here – not all CM. Though CM is the sure foundation in the early years, we found that as our children got older we wanted them to learn more independantly so we began using a variety of resources, adopting an eclectic approach to homeschooling. However, I would never opt out of CM methods at any age when it comes to language arts – reading lots of living books, copywork, narration, and dictation. Years ago, we used Sonlight (similar to MFW) and I was extremely blessed by the pre-planned lay out for that season. I can’t imagine not being able to blend resources, it’s what makes our little homeschool world go round .
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
The topic ‘How many of you combine CM with another curric?’ is closed to new replies.