I know there have been previous posts re. assigning credits for work in high school and that the general thought is 120-150 or perhaps 180 hours equates one credit. I am compiling resources to help HS moms in my CM co-op figure this out. We’re blazing a trail here and some guidance is appreciated. I’m looking for info. to help in general, but also ideas on how to figure our co-op work.
For example, in our CM co-op . . .
We meet 24 weeks per year from 9 am – 1 pm. Of that time, we spend:
30 minutes per week on artist/composer/poet study
30 minutes per week on hymn/folk song study and personal sharing (oral reports)
45 minutes per week on nature study
60 minutes per week on each of two elective classes whose subjects vary.
Taken together:
Fine Arts: 50 minutes x 24 weeks = 1200 minutes or 20 hours per year for fine arts (combining a/c/p with h/fs); over a period of 4 years this equals 80 hours or roughly enough for 1/2 of a standard credit when using the hours mentioned above
Nature Study: 45 minutes x 24 weeks = 1080 minutes or 18 hours per year for science and natural history; over 4 years this equals 72 hours or roughly enough for 1/2 of a standard credit
What subjects would you classify these items in? Art history? Humanities? Science?
While the hours don’t add up to a full credit based on the hours method, the study is ASTRONOMICALLY more than I did in high school. Is this the method you’d advise parents use to figure out their credits for their high schoolers?
I honestly just called it “fine arts” and gave a half credit for that, then detailed what we had done in the course descriptions. (Does the co-op provide course descriptions? VERY VERY helpful if you do!) Then I added in whatever else they had done–one son spent tons of time on piano and organ, although mostly self-taught, and served as our church assistant organist. The next one doesn’t get to play much in church–he plays electric guitar and composes (is just finishing an online song composition course from Berklee). But I take into account how much time they spent and I gave two credits of music study and performance for oldest’s piano, and plan on giving at least one credit for guitar-playing son. So I just counted this as a fine arts credit–many colleges ask directly for a credit in this. I’d keep a detailed list of what was done, using the co-op course description or your own.
For nature study—to be honest, I just counted what work was done in the science courses we did. Yours may be different, being co-op based, but to be honest, by high school time my older kids’ nature study became more focused on what they were already studying, and on Scouting. They became very goal-oriented young men, lol, and didn’t meander and draw in journals much. 🙂 Although they HAVE taught nature related topics at Scout camps and for badges. Yes, I suppose you could detail what was done and give a half-credit in sciences for nature study/observation, in addition to your other courses.
Yes. What we do is always going to be astronimically more, deeper, better. It just is. That’s OK. We still have to communicate with colleges in their “language” of credits, etc. That enables them to do a basic, very very rudimentary comparison of our kids to others. They aren’t going to get the entire picture yet, lol, but just an idea. We often send kids with lots more credits than others anyway. (I got lots of questions on my oldest son’s transcript showing five foreign language credits and six social studies credits, lol.) But I could show based on hours, texts, and other work, that he’d put in time and effort at least somewhat like other kids. It’s been a process of him going to classes in college and finding out that he already knows a lot of the material there that has shown his professors, I think, his greater depth of learning, his greater engagement with the material. That’s OK. Your kids are going to shine and stand out, and that’s OK too.
Just keep good records for the course descriptions!
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
The topic ‘High School Credits with the CM Method’ is closed to new replies.