I agree with all the posts but loved seeing it thought through. Many thanks. I really agree with the idea that it seems a lot more abstract and daunting than it actually is once you wrap your mind around it more. However, I see areas I’ll pay better attention too as well.
Up to this point I’ve designed our courses and I think that this fact gave me pause when I originally posted. I wished I’d had a little more foresight is all. I think I would have structured things I bit differently.
For example, in our elementary and first years of middle school I would do a 3 term year with a different science each term. That was lovely and interesting but I might have chosen different sciences if I had been thinking of our high school science years as being one science per year and no terms.
Our terms are fast disappearing except that they roughly indicate changes in our fine arts studies and are used to monitor overall yearly progress in our book lists for various subjects.
Another aside to this discussion for me is the idea of record keeping. I started homeschooling by generally following the SCM model for planning our year until the level of terms. I would then sketch out my subjects to cover on each day and simply record what we actually did that day in my calendar. In this way I was able to remain very fluid and look at the completion of our week’s work in terms of a week versus a daily check list or other detailed view. This helped me because I’m a big fan of enjoying homeschooling at the expense of formal schooling. If we have an opportunity then I will rarely deny it, but instead incorporate it and do lighter versions of lessons to see that the week’s overall goals are generally met. This works for me because I’ve only lived in Florida and Louisiana where there are very little to no requirements for record keeping and yearly evaluation.
Our later middle school years startled me in to thinking I needed more detailed accounts of what we were doing each day. I tried the SCMO. It’s a great product, as are many of these more detailed record keepers, but not necessary for us. So I’ve dropped back to doing even less record keeping than the “prior to planner” years. I now just keep track of our having done our lessons for the week and if I find we haven’t for all those varying reasons we all know, then I just tack a note to the next week to plug in anything we’ve missed.
In this way I think I’m keeping the hours pretty well to claim the 120 – 180 range needed for the various high school courses. And here I agree wholeheartedly that what I cover and accomplish in my 30 minute science lesson is at least equivalent to the hour spent in a school setting and probably more productive in fact.
In my original post I was also thinking largely on content for high school courses. This primarily because I’m designing them myself and want them to be competitive or exceed equivalencies.
It is a shame that so little variety is required for high school graduation.
I’m not sure I will “package” a variety of subjects/courses/activities together though. I’m not sure I won’t either. I somehow like the idea of showing off the rich variety of their educations. But agreeing that the thousand page transcript is ridiculous too. This is will be an area of consideration as we move forward. I like the idea of designing the year so that these extra subjects/courses/activities were well blended, thoughtfully integrated or nicely complimentary in their combinations for a final credit.
Again, much thanks. It’s nice we are all heading in this direction together. I do hope we will all continue to post together as things arise and we find or seek solutions.
I apologize this was such a long post. I tried here to reply logically. I re-read my original post and was a little embarrassed at its scattered thought process. I’m fighting every viral known to man down here this season and I’m afraid the meds get the best of my little gray cells!