English for the Thoughtful Child vs. Serl's Language Lessons

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Mama
    Member

    Does anyone here have experience w/ both EFTTC and Serl’s and good give me a comparison? I have experience w/ Serl’s Primary Language Lessons, but wasn’t fond of it. Thank you for any insight.

    Mama
    Member

    Another question…is it necessary to use EFTTC or anything similar before age 10? Could I informally introduce the parts of speech and the types of sentences, and then just use copywork and narration? I’m trying to really simplify.

    Sonya Shafer
    Moderator

    I haven’t used both, but I can address your second question. EFTTC doesn’t focus on parts of speech. It mainly gives some gentle lessons in proper use of the English language in various applications. For example, beginning punctuation for statements, questions, exclamations, commands; capitalizing proper names, cities, days of the week, months of the year, etc.; writing initials; how to write dates; writing a letter and how to address the envelope; using “was” and “were” and “has” and “have” properly; contractions. Those concepts are intermingled with observation and oral narration exercises, plus some nice poems that can be memorized or just enjoyed.

    You could probably find the table of contents for EFTTC and try to point out those concepts in your child’s copywork, but I would think it might be simpler to just do the short lessons once or twice a week using EFTTC. You can do most of them orally on the couch. You might do copywork three days a week and EFTTC twice a week or something simple like that. Just some thoughts. Do what works best. I’m all for simple! Smile

    Mama
    Member

    Thank you for your response. I read that EFTTC 2’s focus is composition. Can that still be done orally with a 4th grader?

    Sonya Shafer
    Moderator

    I don’t think EFTTC 2’s emphasis is much different from Volume 1. Take a look at the EFTTC 2 lesson titles listed in the Bookfinder and see what you think. Obviously, the lessons on writing quotations would need to be written, but I think you could still do most of the lessons orally.

    Betty Dickerson
    Participant

    I personally love how EFTTC has the child refer to the Handbook of Nature STudy.  It was so nice to be able to incorporate the Handbook into our studies and combine language arts and nature study.  I was really hoping they would continue to make a series of EFTTC because we truly enjoyed it and I have never found something else like it.

    I also like that the student can write in the book rather than have to copy everything or write answers on a separate page.  I found that keeping track of lots of papers was hard to do when homeschooling several children.  Also, my boys found all the copying from a textbook so tedious so EFTTC was just the right amount of writing for them. 

    For parts of speech we play lots of Mad Libs.  It’s fun and painless.  Even my 4yr old knew her parts of speech after a roadtrip of playing MadLibs!

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • The topic ‘English for the Thoughtful Child vs. Serl's Language Lessons’ is closed to new replies.