I’m glad Nina posted above and asked this question on whether reading our kids’ books impacts our ability to assess their narrations. I hope we get some answers from the other CM experienced Moms on here as I’d love opinions on that point in particular. I do see that most on this thread are saying that we don’t need to read all of our kids’ books, and that we shouldn’t stress over it. I agree in my heart…
But most often, in my head, I can’t see a way around it… I feel this need to read/skim my kids’ reading assignments (for school) because I don’t seem to assess the strength of their narrations as well without having done so. I’m not trying to make work for myself; it would certainly free up my time if I didn’t have to do this! (and believe me I don’t do it for every book…because really, who can?) But having done it both ways (some books I read/some not), I feel as though the narrations don’t mean as much to me when I haven’t got a good handle on the book.
Overall, on narrations – I think my kids are quite strong (particularly the oldest two, age 9 and 10). I see both of them stating a lot of details, speaking in complete and nicely composed sentences, and giving incredibly vivid descriptions. The oral narrations can go on for upwards of 10 minutes sometimes! Clearly they are “living” their books. But… if I haven’t read the book myself, as much as I THINK the narrations are strong, I never truly know what they choose to leave out; I never see/know which plot developments or other descriptions are not memorable to them.
So, the question is, how do I know how strong the narration is if I don’t know what the child left out on an assigned chapter/book? Is it really as simple as knowing that they did well on the narration if it is detailed, well-composed, lengthy and enthusiastic? (believe me, I would love it if someone would say yes)
I really, really love that a CM education places so much value on what our children observe and make connections with in their readings; I don’t sweat it at all if I hear a narration where some of the chapter content is left out. To me, whatever is left out just happens to be whatever they connected wtih “less”.
But somehow, even though it doesn’t matter a great deal that they left it out, I still feel as their teacher I’m supposed to KNOW what they chose to emphasize versus omit, or what moved them deeply versus what struck them as nonsense. I would love it if the others here on the forum could tell me whether this is truly unnecessary, or whether it’s the ideal but not necessary all the time. (or any other comments!)