Classical mixed in

I imagine there are others on the forum more qualified to respond than me, but I will give it a shot. I have very little knowledge of the classical method as it is used today. But I would consider CM a classical education. While the classical model may have curriculum and subjects theu call logic, rhetoric, and apologetics, CM methods teach them without naming them per se, or using a separate curriculum. Assuming you mean informal logic (I would use an actual curriculum for formal logic) reading great books, discussing ideas, and pointing out errors or fallacies is part of a CM education. We used the Fallacy Detective for a fun way to learn about fallacies. If by rhetoric you mean articulating and defending a point, written and oral narrations do the trick. When the student is ready they learn how to write in the various forms. Apologetics is accomplished through Bible study and living books by great theologians. Starting in 7th grade I begin assigning one apologetic and one worldview book per year. In addition we rotate apologetic and worldview during family time. My teens have read Tozer, Lewis, Schaeffer, and more. I typically start them with It Couldnt Just Happen, Know What You Believe, and  Know Why You Believe because they are easy to read. I hope that helps a little. Looking forward to hearing what others do.