Saraschools, you have a lot of great ideas and encouragement here on this thread. Jeaninpa’s post had me nodding over and over again. I have DS10, DS 8 and DS6…they all started reading at different ages and all spent a different amount of time/energy on the blending stage. It is REALLY individual! The Ruth Beechick book I happen to love is The Three R’s. The chapter on reading is AMAZING, so clear, so much reassurance. Most relevant to you: she talks very specifically about the blending stage and how it is the most important stage, and sometimes – the one that takes the longest. She then states not to move on to anything else until blending is solid. She also states without reservation that often 6 is too young, and that sometimes if we push it, we can possibly makes things worse by confusing the child! I am using Ruth Beechick’s strategies and AAR at the moment with DS6 and AAR mentions this as well about the age 6 issue. Most certainly my eldest two were closer to 7 before it “clicked”. Second son was well over 7. It’s totally okay.
On the comparison thing – and giving yourself permission to take your time – just my opinion, but I really feel that time and patience might actually do more than a new approach or a different book. I realize this is hard when you feel “eyes” on you. Try to stay strong on this. For what’s worth – I volunteered in PS in 2nd grade before I pulled my kids and I’ll tell you a secret I learned: the reason public schools designed a system where reading starts SO early is because it’s going to take them THAT long (K to 3rd grade) to teach THAT many kids to read (and keeping in mind they are of different ages to some extent). The PS setting is also a place where there is VERY little time for one-on-one instruction. So again, it takes longer and so, they start earlier! They also have to sift through the challenge kids, identify and implement remedial reading strategies. If this ALL weren’t enough, they need to deal with summer breaks every year and all the “forgetting” kids do between K and 1st and then again 1st to 2nd. Again, all of this necessitates the need to begin reading instruction before age 6. Sure, some of the kids, including your nieces, will be on one end of the scale (learning to read quickly and therefore “early”… right at age 5-6), but many (many!) others are in the middle of that scale (age 6.5 -7.5) or the slower end (7.5-8.5…still considered normal).
A practical tip I can give you would be to switch up your lessons to every second day. I was hesitant to do this with my DS6, thinking with a whole day’s break in between lessons he would surely advance more slowly …. but I was completely wrong. He approached his lessons even more fresh and has become more productive! It’s as though that day of rest is spent storing up and considering what he’d learned the previous day. So perhaps one-day-reading-lesson, and then one day only read-aloud by you and a bit of copywork. The variety might be just the thing, and certainly this is a very CM-friendly strategy.
HTH some! Blessings and good luck, Angie
PS – Karen, do we have the same SIL ?! Your second paragraph above “I finally resigned myself” is EXACTLY where I landed this past year with that side of my family. And in fact, in just staying quiet and not engaging in the conversation beyond polite responses, I’m actually way more at peace about the whole thing now, too.